205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-59.19%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-59.19% vs MCHP's -11.11%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-14.52%
Both MCHP and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-22.83%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x MCHP's -11.11%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-11.62%
Receivables growth less than half of MCHP's 6.92%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-4.30%
Inventory growth above 1.5x MCHP's -1.27%. Michael Burry might suspect a looming inventory glut. Check free cash flow impact.
-8.07%
Other current assets growth < half of MCHP's 4.50%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-14.92%
≥ 1.5x MCHP's -0.69%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
10.02%
0.5-0.75x MCHP's 18.74%. Martin Whitman might see a risk of falling behind in asset investment or shifting strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.05%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-9.05%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.43%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
8.54%
Less than half of MCHP's -3.77%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
7.63%
Below half of MCHP's 18.31%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.70%
Below half of MCHP's 9.77%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-58.62%
Less than half of MCHP's 24.60%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-68.92%
50-75% of MCHP's -100.00%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the firm is less reliant on near-term borrowing than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Similar yoy growth to MCHP's -100.00%. Walter Schloss notes parallel approach to deferred revenue.
-100.00%
Less than half of MCHP's 29.80%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-33.06%
Less than half of MCHP's 19.35%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.99%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.54%
Above 1.5x MCHP's 0.99%. Michael Burry sees a much bigger deferred tax load building up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.64%
Above 1.5x MCHP's 0.88%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.38%
Less than half of MCHP's 17.42%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.23%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2.08%
Below half MCHP's 10.06%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
35.23%
Less than half of MCHP's -14.97%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.29%
Below half MCHP's 7.47%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-2.70%
Below half MCHP's 9.77%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-14.52%
Both MCHP and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-6.60%
Less than half of MCHP's -100.00%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
56.70%
Above 1.5x MCHP's 6.64%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.