205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
78.29%
Cash & equivalents growing 78.29% while MCHP's declined -29.98%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
-11.24%
Both MCHP and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-2.43%
Below half of MCHP's -29.98%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-14.48%
Receivables growth above 1.5x MCHP's -5.90%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
-8.31%
Inventory growth below half of MCHP's 7.06%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-27.97%
Other current assets growth < half of MCHP's 6.98%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-9.07%
0.5-0.75x MCHP's -13.53%. Martin Whitman might see risk if this hampers near-term financial flexibility.
-0.83%
Below half MCHP's 25.13%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.15%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-5.15%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
116.38%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.37%
Less than half of MCHP's -0.04%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
0.83%
Below half of MCHP's 24.74%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.13%
Below half of MCHP's 9.19%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
74.21%
Less than half of MCHP's -4.30%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-6.52%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.95%
Less than half of MCHP's 4.05%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-2.12%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.46%
Less than half of MCHP's 0.97%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
12.30%
Less than half of MCHP's -4.31%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
0.85%
1.1-1.25x MCHP's 0.73%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is outpacing competitor in long-term leverage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.83%
Less than half of MCHP's 3.75%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.17%
Less than half of MCHP's 49.38%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-2.47%
Below half MCHP's 10.50%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-3.36%
Above 1.5x MCHP's -0.16%. Michael Burry sees a significant jump in intangible or market-based gains. Scrutinize risk of reversal.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.58%
Below half MCHP's 10.99%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-3.13%
Below half MCHP's 9.19%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-11.24%
Both MCHP and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-2.28%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-27.53%
Less than half of MCHP's 29.98%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.