PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
97.95%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth at least 1.5x MCHP's 43.39%. Mohnish Pabrai might see this as a favorable liquidity edge, provided funds are well deployed.
-18.10%
Both MCHP and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
4.78%
Below half of MCHP's 43.39%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-2.08%
Receivables growth less than half of MCHP's -7.83%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
0.37%
Inventory growth below half of MCHP's -2.02%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
3.09%
Other current assets growth < half of MCHP's 82.35%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
1.33%
Below half of MCHP's 15.92%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-2.46%
0.75-0.9x MCHP's -2.95%. Bill Ackman questions if competitor invests more heavily in future capacity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.25%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.25%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.24%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-43.51%
Above 1.5x MCHP's -3.32%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
-1.77%
0.5-0.75x MCHP's -2.95%. Martin Whitman wonders if there's insufficient reinvestment vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.60%
Below half of MCHP's 3.67%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
8.29%
Less than half of MCHP's -12.78%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
10.32%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.19%
Both MCHP and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
7.18%
Less than half of MCHP's -6.83%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
1.17%
Less than half of MCHP's -9.21%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-1.19%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.65%
Less than half of MCHP's 26.53%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
27.90%
Less than half of MCHP's -5.25%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
9.13%
Less than half of MCHP's 25.48%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.37%
Less than half of MCHP's -4.05%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.69%
Below half MCHP's 4.14%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-174.88%
Above 1.5x MCHP's -7.28%. Michael Burry sees a significant jump in intangible or market-based gains. Scrutinize risk of reversal.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.50%
Below half MCHP's 4.91%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-0.60%
Below half MCHP's 3.67%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
32.32%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating better performance.
0.24%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-61.96%
1.25-1.5x MCHP's -42.14%. Martin Whitman is wary of heavier net leverage vs. competitor.