205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-7.46%
Cash & equivalents declining -7.46% while MCHP's grows 40.26%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
13.73%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating better performance.
6.76%
Below half of MCHP's 40.26%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
5.69%
Receivables growth 1.25-1.5x MCHP's 3.84%. Martin Whitman would worry that the company may be booking revenue too aggressively.
-0.50%
Inventory growth below half of MCHP's 1.97%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-1.71%
Other current assets growth < half of MCHP's 4.31%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
5.38%
Below half of MCHP's 13.80%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-3.09%
≥ 1.5x MCHP's -0.83%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
10.02%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
11.15%
Less than half of MCHP's -0.55%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
11.15%
Less than half of MCHP's -0.55%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-25.97%
Both MCHP and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
15.69%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
19.74%
Above 1.5x MCHP's 0.37%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
1.28%
Below half of MCHP's -0.81%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.09%
0.5-0.75x MCHP's 4.79%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
10.89%
1.25-1.5x MCHP's 7.83%. Martin Whitman sees potential reliance on supplier financing. Verify liquidity.
538.24%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
7.58%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
7.14%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating better performance.
7.58%
Less than half of MCHP's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
32.18%
Above 1.5x MCHP's 7.63%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-50.31%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.42%
Above 1.5x MCHP's -0.66%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
-27.40%
Less than half of MCHP's 17.99%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.92%
Less than half of MCHP's 9.17%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.75%
Similar yoy to MCHP's 5.06%. Walter Schloss sees parallel earnings retention vs. competitor.
44.49%
Less than half of MCHP's -5.17%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.44%
1.25-1.5x MCHP's 3.96%. Bruce Berkowitz notes an above-average equity expansion.
3.09%
0.5-0.75x MCHP's 4.79%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
1.50%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating better performance.
-4.68%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
24.65%
Less than half of MCHP's -40.26%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.