205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
92.79%
Cash & equivalents growing 92.79% while MCHP's declined -72.80%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
6.40%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating better performance.
31.06%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x MCHP's 9.22%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-4.66%
Receivables growth less than half of MCHP's 2.15%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-1.11%
Inventory growth below half of MCHP's 8.92%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-22.05%
Above 1.5x MCHP's -2.68%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
13.47%
≥ 1.5x MCHP's 3.79%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
-2.57%
≥ 1.5x MCHP's -1.26%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
-100.00%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.82%
Less than half of MCHP's 20.34%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
-2.82%
Less than half of MCHP's 20.34%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-100.00%
Both MCHP and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
2.29%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
16.76%
Less than half of MCHP's -18.98%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-5.92%
≥ 1.5x MCHP's -0.54%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.81%
≥ 1.5x MCHP's 1.26%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
4.18%
Less than half of MCHP's -6.77%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
0.69%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
13.33%
Below half of MCHP's 53.52%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
-11.97%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.43%
Less than half of MCHP's 8.91%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-1.74%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.18%
Above 1.5x MCHP's -9.36%. Michael Burry sees a much bigger deferred tax load building up.
-0.80%
Less than half of MCHP's -4.82%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-2.89%
Less than half of MCHP's -9.23%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.33%
Less than half of MCHP's 6.00%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-0.11%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
5.25%
≥ 1.5x MCHP's 2.21%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
-38.89%
Above 1.5x MCHP's -4.64%. Michael Burry sees a significant jump in intangible or market-based gains. Scrutinize risk of reversal.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.82%
≥ 1.5x MCHP's 0.31%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
2.81%
≥ 1.5x MCHP's 1.26%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
-17.51%
Both MCHP and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-0.48%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-821.50%
Less than half of MCHP's 72.80%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
