PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-24.31%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-24.31% vs MCHP's -0.82%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
23.73%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating better performance.
0.88%
Below half of MCHP's -0.82%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
5.53%
Receivables growth above 1.5x MCHP's 0.30%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
7.85%
Inventory growth above 1.5x MCHP's 2.83%. Michael Burry might suspect a looming inventory glut. Check free cash flow impact.
-1.49%
Other current assets growth < half of MCHP's -3.79%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
2.37%
≥ 1.5x MCHP's 0.55%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
5.80%
1.25-1.5x MCHP's 4.39%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a significant push to expand capacity faster than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.06%
Less than half of MCHP's -4.45%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
0.13%
Less than half of MCHP's -1.86%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-87.24%
Below half of MCHP's 100.00%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
3.80%
Less than half of MCHP's -1.70%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
40.51%
Less than half of MCHP's -98.09%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
2.50%
Below half of MCHP's -1.49%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.43%
Below half of MCHP's -1.22%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-1.84%
50-75% of MCHP's -2.74%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the company is paying suppliers faster or not stretching terms as competitor does.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
234.71%
Above 1.5x MCHP's 17.28%. Michael Burry questions if there's an abrupt jump in tax obligations or poor payment scheduling.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.98%
Less than half of MCHP's 17.28%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-1.60%
Less than half of MCHP's -54.80%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.01%
Less than half of MCHP's 12.48%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-100.00%
≥ 1.5x MCHP's -0.38%. David Dodd sees stronger long-horizon revenue vs. competitor.
8.05%
Less than half of MCHP's -1.82%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
31.23%
Above 1.5x MCHP's 11.89%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
-0.49%
Less than half of MCHP's 10.73%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.74%
Less than half of MCHP's -3.44%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.47%
0.5-0.75x MCHP's 4.12%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
2.55%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.13%
1.25-1.5x MCHP's 3.43%. Bruce Berkowitz notes an above-average equity expansion.
2.43%
Below half MCHP's -1.22%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
23.73%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating better performance.
0.01%
Less than half of MCHP's -3.80%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
36.24%
Less than half of MCHP's -3.90%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.