205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-16.65%
Cash & equivalents declining -16.65% while MCHP's grows 23.77%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
29.14%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating better performance.
8.38%
Below half of MCHP's 23.58%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-6.85%
Receivables growth 1.1-1.25x MCHP's -5.63%. Bill Ackman would demand reasons for extending more credit than the competitor.
9.32%
Inventory growth 1.1-1.25x MCHP's 7.65%. Bill Ackman would question if the firm overestimates demand vs. competitor.
-10.86%
Above 1.5x MCHP's -4.06%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
5.59%
≥ 1.5x MCHP's 2.39%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
9.34%
≥ 1.5x MCHP's 0.67%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.54%
Above 1.5x MCHP's -4.99%. Michael Burry might suspect inflated intangible valuations or questionable M&A additions.
-0.16%
Less than half of MCHP's -2.00%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-87.50%
Both MCHP and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-0.68%
50-75% of MCHP's -0.98%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower deferred tax growth.
44.55%
Less than half of MCHP's 5062.59%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
5.18%
Below half of MCHP's -1.56%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.40%
Below half of MCHP's -1.03%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
9.55%
Less than half of MCHP's -0.43%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.96%
Below half of MCHP's 69.70%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.80%
Less than half of MCHP's 69.70%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
9.30%
Similar yoy to MCHP's 8.64%. Walter Schloss sees parallel short-term liability strategies.
10.27%
Less than half of MCHP's -4.05%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Below half MCHP's 1.72%. Michael Burry suspects a serious gap in multi-year pipeline.
2.22%
Less than half of MCHP's -5.26%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-1.13%
Less than half of MCHP's -2.68%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
8.44%
Less than half of MCHP's -3.89%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.64%
Less than half of MCHP's -2.55%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.57%
Below half MCHP's 6.13%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
14.44%
Above 1.5x MCHP's 4.51%. Michael Burry sees a significant jump in intangible or market-based gains. Scrutinize risk of reversal.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.94%
≥ 1.5x MCHP's 1.76%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
5.40%
Below half MCHP's -1.03%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
29.14%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating better performance.
9.57%
Less than half of MCHP's -4.46%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
38.52%
Less than half of MCHP's -5.35%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.