205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-23.19%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-23.19% vs MCHP's -19.17%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
20.62%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating better performance.
0.07%
Below half of MCHP's -19.07%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
4.21%
Receivables growth less than half of MCHP's -1.03%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
13.41%
Similar inventory growth to MCHP's 13.00%. Walter Schloss notes comparable inventory strategies or sector norms.
-11.50%
Above 1.5x MCHP's -0.77%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
3.27%
≥ 1.5x MCHP's 1.24%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
11.22%
1.25-1.5x MCHP's 9.39%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a significant push to expand capacity faster than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.14%
Less than half of MCHP's -4.25%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
0.07%
Less than half of MCHP's -1.56%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
531.03%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating better performance.
10.49%
Less than half of MCHP's -3.17%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
10.56%
1.1-1.25x MCHP's 9.44%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm invests in intangible or other non-core areas more aggressively.
8.65%
Below half of MCHP's -0.74%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.88%
Below half of MCHP's -0.42%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-3.05%
Less than half of MCHP's 24.65%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-40.20%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-67.47%
Below half of MCHP's 23.37%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.64%
Similar yoy changes to MCHP's 16.31%. Walter Schloss finds parallel near-term liability trends.
-6.65%
Less than half of MCHP's 70.89%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
13.44%
Less than half of MCHP's -16.64%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.48%
Less than half of MCHP's 1.97%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-5.46%
Less than half of MCHP's 1.11%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
10.97%
Less than half of MCHP's -14.24%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.31%
Less than half of MCHP's -1.88%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.16%
Below half MCHP's 8.31%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
2.38%
Less than half of MCHP's 30.12%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.57%
≥ 1.5x MCHP's 2.09%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
5.88%
Below half MCHP's -0.42%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
20.62%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating better performance.
10.79%
Less than half of MCHP's -3.44%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
37.72%
Less than half of MCHP's -2.61%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
