205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
15.51%
Cash & equivalents growing 15.51% while MCHP's declined -19.00%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
-12.08%
Both MCHP and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-4.17%
Below half of MCHP's -19.00%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-9.56%
Receivables growth less than half of MCHP's 11.09%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
2.33%
Inventory growth below half of MCHP's 13.69%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
187.17%
Above 1.5x MCHP's 0.34%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
0.17%
Below half of MCHP's 8.31%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
7.29%
1.25-1.5x MCHP's 5.76%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a significant push to expand capacity faster than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.59%
Less than half of MCHP's -4.96%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
1.89%
Less than half of MCHP's -1.72%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
521.69%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating better performance.
19.78%
Less than half of MCHP's -0.41%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-55.64%
Less than half of MCHP's 42.74%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
4.14%
≥ 1.5x MCHP's 0.14%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.24%
1.25-1.5x MCHP's 1.58%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a stronger asset build. Check if it's producing returns.
12.48%
Similar yoy growth to MCHP's 11.87%. Walter Schloss sees parallel payables strategy. Check top-line correlation.
99.67%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
59.26%
Below half of MCHP's 542.13%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
59.26%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating better performance.
70.63%
Less than half of MCHP's 692.45%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
25.19%
Less than half of MCHP's 93.57%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-2.73%
Less than half of MCHP's -23.48%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-23.40%
Both MCHP and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
-4.55%
Less than half of MCHP's 5.96%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-29.33%
Above 1.5x MCHP's -2.51%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
-1.81%
Less than half of MCHP's -17.76%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.96%
Above 1.5x MCHP's 0.53%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.36%
Below half MCHP's 7.62%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
12.77%
Less than half of MCHP's 76.57%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.60%
Below half MCHP's 3.20%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
2.24%
1.25-1.5x MCHP's 1.58%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions are well-justified by ROI.
-12.08%
Both MCHP and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
0.01%
Less than half of MCHP's -2.26%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-4.59%
Above 1.5x MCHP's -1.49%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.