205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-33.57%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-33.57% vs MRVL's -6.58%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
747.62%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating better performance.
13.21%
Below half of MRVL's 55.45%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
4.12%
Receivables growth less than half of MRVL's 11.24%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
11.16%
Inventory growth above 1.5x MRVL's 4.05%. Michael Burry might suspect a looming inventory glut. Check free cash flow impact.
-0.42%
Other current assets growth < half of MRVL's 30.03%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
6.33%
Below half of MRVL's 22.99%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
0.68%
Below half MRVL's -1.50%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.30%
Less than half of MRVL's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-28.39%
Less than half of MRVL's 38.53%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-3.22%
0.5-0.75x MRVL's -5.26%. Martin Whitman wonders if there's insufficient reinvestment vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.34%
Below half of MRVL's -0.89%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
14.72%
Less than half of MRVL's -9.56%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-85.87%
Less than half of MRVL's 869.27%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.27%
Less than half of MRVL's 45.13%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
1.46%
Less than half of MRVL's -24.32%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.62%
Less than half of MRVL's -35.23%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
2.32%
Less than half of MRVL's -20.65%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.09%
Above 1.5x MRVL's -0.98%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
0.52%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
7.42%
0.5-0.75x MRVL's 11.37%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
-116.67%
Similar yoy to MRVL's -125.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel comprehensive income changes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.41%
Below half MRVL's -0.85%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
1.34%
Below half MRVL's -0.89%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
747.62%
0.5-0.75x MRVL's 1221.16%. Martin Whitman sees possible missed opportunities vs. competitor.
-14.52%
Less than half of MRVL's 3.89%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
3.91%
50-75% of MRVL's 6.81%. Bruce Berkowitz notes comparatively lower net debt expansion.