205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-18.23%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-18.23% vs MRVL's -6.58%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-23.39%
Both MRVL and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-21.66%
Below half of MRVL's 55.45%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-2.29%
Receivables growth less than half of MRVL's 11.24%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
4.58%
Inventory growth 1.1-1.25x MRVL's 4.05%. Bill Ackman would question if the firm overestimates demand vs. competitor.
-0.17%
Other current assets growth < half of MRVL's 30.03%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-10.70%
Below half of MRVL's 22.99%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.46%
Below half MRVL's -1.50%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.44%
Less than half of MRVL's 38.53%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
3.67%
Below half of MRVL's -5.26%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.42%
≥ 1.5x MRVL's -0.89%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-67.82%
Above 1.5x MRVL's -9.56%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
-5.63%
Less than half of MRVL's 869.27%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both MRVL and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-100.00%
Similar yoy changes to MRVL's -100.00%. Walter Schloss finds parallel near-term liability trends.
-20.47%
Less than half of MRVL's 45.13%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-3.11%
Less than half of MRVL's -24.32%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.78%
Less than half of MRVL's -35.23%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-1.27%
Less than half of MRVL's -20.65%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.98%
Above 1.5x MRVL's -0.98%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
0.26%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.25%
Below half MRVL's 11.37%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-13.21%
Less than half of MRVL's -125.00%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.07%
Below half MRVL's -0.85%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-4.42%
≥ 1.5x MRVL's -0.89%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
-23.39%
Below half MRVL's 1221.16%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-3.24%
Less than half of MRVL's 3.89%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
41.23%
Above 1.5x MRVL's 6.81%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.