205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
97.95%
Cash & equivalents growing 97.95% while MRVL's declined -16.30%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
-18.10%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of MRVL's 56.50%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
4.78%
Below half of MRVL's -2.39%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-2.08%
Receivables growth less than half of MRVL's 20.56%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
0.37%
Inventory growth below half of MRVL's 1.01%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
3.09%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.33%
0.5-0.75x MRVL's 2.33%. Martin Whitman might see risk if this hampers near-term financial flexibility.
-2.46%
Below half MRVL's 3.51%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.25%
Less than half of MRVL's -5.52%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
-2.25%
Less than half of MRVL's -5.52%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.24%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-43.51%
Less than half of MRVL's 3.88%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-1.77%
Below half of MRVL's -5.29%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.60%
Below half of MRVL's -4.29%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
8.29%
Less than half of MRVL's -9.65%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
10.32%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.19%
≥ 1.5x MRVL's -0.93%. David Dodd sees stronger subscription/prepayment demand.
7.18%
Less than half of MRVL's 120.23%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
1.17%
Less than half of MRVL's 5.75%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-1.19%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.65%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
27.90%
Less than half of MRVL's -11.91%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
9.13%
Less than half of MRVL's -11.91%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.37%
1.25-1.5x MRVL's 4.22%. Martin Whitman is wary of bigger liability expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.69%
Below half MRVL's -23.72%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-174.88%
Less than half of MRVL's 22.93%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.50%
0.5-0.75x MRVL's -4.56%. Martin Whitman is wary of lagging equity growth vs. competitor.
-0.60%
Below half MRVL's -4.29%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
32.32%
0.5-0.75x MRVL's 56.50%. Martin Whitman sees possible missed opportunities vs. competitor.
0.24%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-61.96%
Less than half of MRVL's 16.30%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.