205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-0.08%
Cash & equivalents declining -0.08% while MRVL's grows 10.30%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
-27.42%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of MRVL's 3.46%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-15.62%
Below half of MRVL's 5.82%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
10.22%
Receivables growth less than half of MRVL's -4.63%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
1.73%
Inventory growth below half of MRVL's 7.66%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-3.10%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-3.14%
Below half of MRVL's 4.10%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-2.43%
Below half MRVL's 2.62%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.48%
Less than half of MRVL's -8.98%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
-1.41%
Above 1.5x MRVL's -0.50%. Michael Burry sees potential overpaying or intangible bubble risk. Check synergy assumptions.
-8.79%
Both MRVL and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-4.64%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-4.58%
Less than half of MRVL's 10.58%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-2.01%
Below half of MRVL's 0.39%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.44%
Below half of MRVL's 2.39%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-5.77%
Less than half of MRVL's 10.04%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
85.53%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-4.72%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-4.72%
Below half of MRVL's -16.15%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
18.85%
Less than half of MRVL's -10.93%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
31.35%
Above 1.5x MRVL's 2.54%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-35.75%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.18%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
3.58%
Less than half of MRVL's -1.33%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-24.66%
Above 1.5x MRVL's -1.33%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.43%
Less than half of MRVL's 1.68%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.94%
Below half MRVL's 22.35%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
0.13%
Less than half of MRVL's -12.58%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.79%
Below half MRVL's 2.50%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-2.44%
Below half MRVL's 2.39%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-24.96%
Below half MRVL's 3.40%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-11.01%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-14.20%
1.25-1.5x MRVL's -10.30%. Martin Whitman is wary of heavier net leverage vs. competitor.