205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-22.30%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-22.30% vs MRVL's -0.47%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-35.63%
Short-term investments yoy growth ≥ 1.5x MRVL's -0.32%. David Dodd would see a more robust near-cash position, but confirm efficient allocation.
-30.46%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x MRVL's -0.37%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
12.69%
Similar receivables growth to MRVL's 16.34%. Walter Schloss would see comparable credit policies, investigating any subtle differences in sales.
1.75%
Inventory growth below half of MRVL's 23.89%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
0.86%
Other current assets growth < half of MRVL's -0.02%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-10.81%
Below half of MRVL's 4.31%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-4.25%
0.75-0.9x MRVL's -5.49%. Bill Ackman questions if competitor invests more heavily in future capacity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.99%
Less than half of MRVL's 99.52%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
-1.36%
Less than half of MRVL's 3.88%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
3.30%
Below half of MRVL's 82.75%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
-3.00%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.81%
Less than half of MRVL's -80.29%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-2.09%
≥ 1.5x MRVL's -0.85%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.94%
Below half of MRVL's 1.62%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-0.74%
Less than half of MRVL's 15.54%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-74.60%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
7.92%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
7.92%
Below half of MRVL's 27.32%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
33.15%
Less than half of MRVL's -0.39%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-27.03%
Less than half of MRVL's 9.87%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-5.55%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.70%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-3.78%
Less than half of MRVL's -11.23%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-5.18%
Less than half of MRVL's -11.23%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.68%
Less than half of MRVL's 5.59%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.25%
0.5-0.75x MRVL's 2.05%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
1.54%
Less than half of MRVL's -172.24%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.45%
Below half MRVL's 0.92%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-5.94%
Below half MRVL's 1.62%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-32.55%
Below half MRVL's 0.87%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-17.76%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-16.03%
Less than half of MRVL's 0.47%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.