205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-37.40%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-37.40% vs MRVL's -4.56%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
151.28%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating better performance.
6.32%
Below half of MRVL's -4.56%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-19.97%
Receivables growth less than half of MRVL's 8.67%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-1.91%
Inventory growth below half of MRVL's -26.64%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
13.26%
Other current assets growth < half of MRVL's -100.00%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
0.55%
Below half of MRVL's -8.22%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-0.45%
Below half MRVL's 1.87%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.42%
Less than half of MRVL's 1.77%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
-1.20%
Less than half of MRVL's 0.52%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
0.67%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating better performance.
-23.35%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
18.89%
Less than half of MRVL's -57.88%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-0.24%
Below half of MRVL's -1.04%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.14%
Below half of MRVL's -2.10%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-2.27%
Less than half of MRVL's -11.55%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
0.20%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-20.69%
Below half of MRVL's 154.72%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
-20.69%
Below half of MRVL's 14.25%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
17.24%
Less than half of MRVL's -8.64%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
5.78%
Less than half of MRVL's -2.96%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.02%
Less than half of MRVL's -4.04%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-24.39%
Both MRVL and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
59.18%
Less than half of MRVL's 127.98%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-2.11%
Less than half of MRVL's 1.25%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-0.17%
Less than half of MRVL's 3.65%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.15%
50-75% of MRVL's 2.02%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a lower yoy liability increase.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.56%
Below half MRVL's -21.19%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
21.67%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.87%
Below half MRVL's -3.55%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
0.14%
Below half MRVL's -2.10%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
120.79%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating better performance.
0.03%
Less than half of MRVL's -4.04%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
76.42%
Less than half of MRVL's -3.78%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.