205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
3.32%
Cash & equivalents growing 3.32% while MRVL's declined -1.81%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
-24.61%
Both MRVL and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-11.97%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x MRVL's -1.81%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
22.53%
Receivables growth less than half of MRVL's -4.62%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
0.10%
Inventory growth below half of MRVL's -5.44%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-16.72%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-5.15%
1.25-1.5x MRVL's -3.75%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if strong current asset growth is used effectively.
-2.12%
Below half MRVL's 2.39%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.65%
Less than half of MRVL's -7.63%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
0.40%
Less than half of MRVL's -2.51%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-88.67%
Both MRVL and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
5.58%
Less than half of MRVL's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
3.21%
Less than half of MRVL's 267.95%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-3.07%
Below half of MRVL's 0.97%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.08%
Below half of MRVL's 0.31%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-6.44%
Less than half of MRVL's 3.18%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
110.20%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
34.78%
Below half of MRVL's -21.63%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
34.78%
Below half of MRVL's -7.33%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
-22.69%
Exceeding 1.5x MRVL's -5.35%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
12.15%
Above 1.5x MRVL's 1.66%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
3.70%
Less than half of MRVL's -2.79%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
2.15%
Higher Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating better performance.
-17.95%
Less than half of MRVL's 1.58%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
19.07%
50-75% of MRVL's 33.83%. Bruce Berkowitz sees fewer new long-term commitments.
2.58%
50-75% of MRVL's 4.69%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a smaller yoy liability buildup than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.81%
1.1-1.25x MRVL's 3.98%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is incurring more total obligations than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.82%
Below half MRVL's -7.87%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
5.48%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.17%
≥ 1.5x MRVL's -1.04%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-4.08%
Below half MRVL's 0.31%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-30.52%
Both MRVL and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
12.87%
Less than half of MRVL's -2.79%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
19.79%
Less than half of MRVL's -3.29%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.