205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-18.22%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-18.22% vs MRVL's -10.04%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
24.01%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating better performance.
-0.44%
Below half of MRVL's -10.04%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
2.90%
Receivables growth less than half of MRVL's 9.46%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
2.52%
Inventory growth below half of MRVL's -0.06%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
16.72%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.74%
Below half of MRVL's -2.54%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
27.85%
Below half MRVL's -2.93%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.37%
Above 1.5x MRVL's -3.31%. Michael Burry might suspect inflated intangible valuations or questionable M&A additions.
-0.27%
Less than half of MRVL's -1.08%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
55.56%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating better performance.
-14.89%
Less than half of MRVL's 3.96%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
15.61%
Less than half of MRVL's 33.26%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
13.45%
Below half of MRVL's -0.19%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.03%
Below half of MRVL's -0.55%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
9.56%
Similar yoy growth to MRVL's 12.63%. Walter Schloss sees parallel payables strategy. Check top-line correlation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.80%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
1.25-1.5x MRVL's -89.40%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if there's a competitive advantage in forward billing.
135.03%
Exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 17.40%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
6.46%
Less than half of MRVL's -7.79%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.03%
50-75% of MRVL's 0.04%. Bruce Berkowitz notes less new LT debt than competitor.
-38.76%
Both MRVL and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
1.16%
Less than half of MRVL's -40.61%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-23.19%
Above 1.5x MRVL's -11.80%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
0.75%
Less than half of MRVL's -1.19%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.99%
Less than half of MRVL's -4.35%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.39%
Below half MRVL's -1.12%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
49.84%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.73%
≥ 1.5x MRVL's 0.55%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
6.03%
Below half MRVL's -0.55%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
24.01%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating better performance.
0.03%
Less than half of MRVL's -11.10%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
49.81%
Less than half of MRVL's -12.83%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.