205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-24.31%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-24.31% vs MRVL's -30.19%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
23.73%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating better performance.
0.88%
Below half of MRVL's -30.19%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
5.53%
Receivables growth less than half of MRVL's 29.39%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
7.85%
Inventory growth below half of MRVL's 100.62%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-1.49%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2.37%
Below half of MRVL's 16.74%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
5.80%
Below half MRVL's 35.81%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.06%
Less than half of MRVL's 172.21%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
0.13%
Less than half of MRVL's 126.83%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-87.24%
Below half of MRVL's 361.30%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
3.80%
Less than half of MRVL's 7.91%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
40.51%
Above 1.5x MRVL's 2.19%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
2.50%
Below half of MRVL's 111.44%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.43%
Below half of MRVL's 97.21%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-1.84%
Less than half of MRVL's 20.60%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
234.71%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.98%
Exceeding 1.5x MRVL's -17.68%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-1.60%
Less than half of MRVL's 7.71%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.01%
Less than half of MRVL's 370.70%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Both MRVL and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
8.05%
Less than half of MRVL's 1035.25%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
31.23%
Above 1.5x MRVL's 18.88%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
-0.49%
Less than half of MRVL's 316.48%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.74%
Less than half of MRVL's 173.69%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.47%
Below half MRVL's -6.12%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
2.55%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to MRVL's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.13%
Below half MRVL's 76.10%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
2.43%
Below half MRVL's 97.21%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
23.73%
Below half MRVL's 361.30%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
0.01%
Less than half of MRVL's 310.66%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
36.24%
Less than half of MRVL's 884.80%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.