PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
33.17%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth at least 1.5x MU's 9.05%. Mohnish Pabrai might see this as a favorable liquidity edge, provided funds are well deployed.
27.27%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to MU's zero value, indicating better performance.
29.95%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x MU's 9.05%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
10.84%
Similar receivables growth to MU's 13.52%. Walter Schloss would see comparable credit policies, investigating any subtle differences in sales.
2.55%
Inventory growth below half of MU's 17.67%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
0.60%
Other current assets growth < half of MU's 91.46%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
12.91%
0.75-0.9x MU's 16.72%. Bill Ackman would ask if competitor is building short-term resources more aggressively.
1.59%
Below half MU's 11.81%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.21%
Similar yoy growth to MU's -11.39%. Walter Schloss sees parallel approach in non-core expansions.
0.49%
Below half of MU's 7.93%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.36%
0.5-0.75x MU's 11.94%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
-58.27%
Less than half of MU's 28.77%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
13.74%
Less than half of MU's -3.54%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both MU and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-100.00%
Less than half of MU's 20.07%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
13.49%
50-75% of MU's 23.62%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the firm keeps current liabilities growth relatively low.
-1.59%
Less than half of MU's -22.98%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.42%
Less than half of MU's 16.89%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
0.18%
Less than half of MU's -3.90%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.42%
50-75% of MU's 13.89%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a lower yoy liability increase.
1.10%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to MU's zero value, indicating worse performance.
8.95%
Higher Retained Earnings Growth compared to MU's zero value, indicating better performance.
-10.00%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to MU's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.26%
0.5-0.75x MU's 10.95%. Martin Whitman is wary of lagging equity growth vs. competitor.
7.36%
0.5-0.75x MU's 11.94%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
27.27%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to MU's zero value, indicating better performance.
1.99%
Less than half of MU's -16.79%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-23.15%
Less than half of MU's -54.80%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.