PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-3.16%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-3.16% vs MU's -21.29%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
9.58%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to MU's zero value, indicating better performance.
3.64%
Below half of MU's 330.85%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
7.11%
Receivables growth less than half of MU's -42.01%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
4.86%
Inventory growth below half of MU's -2.36%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
2.70%
Other current assets growth < half of MU's -55.64%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
5.10%
≥ 1.5x MU's 3.08%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
4.02%
Below half MU's 9.08%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.42%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to MU's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-17.05%
Less than half of MU's -74.47%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
1.93%
Below half of MU's 7.86%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.78%
0.5-0.75x MU's 5.59%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
5.07%
Less than half of MU's -9.86%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-7.50%
Less than half of MU's -15.78%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.63%
Less than half of MU's -13.38%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.73%
Less than half of MU's 1.64%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.80%
Less than half of MU's 40.03%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
0.77%
Less than half of MU's 1.67%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.27%
Less than half of MU's -8.89%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.31%
Below half MU's 53.90%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.77%
0.5-0.75x MU's 13.17%. Martin Whitman is wary of lagging equity growth vs. competitor.
3.78%
0.5-0.75x MU's 5.59%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
9.58%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to MU's zero value, indicating better performance.
-1.41%
Less than half of MU's -4.78%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
1.04%
Less than half of MU's 53.79%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.