205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
69.92%
Cash & equivalents growing 69.92% while ON's declined -8.54%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.92%
Below half of ON's -6.17%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-12.39%
Receivables growth less than half of ON's 12.36%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-5.12%
Inventory growth below half of ON's 0.43%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-6.28%
Other current assets growth < half of ON's 24.29%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.01%
Similar yoy growth to ON's -3.25%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital spending strategies. Check utilization rates.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.14%
Less than half of ON's -6.67%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-2.92%
1.25-1.5x ON's -2.20%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions surpass competitor's pace but remain justified.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.55%
≥ 1.5x ON's -0.96%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
298.35%
Less than half of ON's -4.49%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-71.15%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.18%
Less than half of ON's 1.11%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
6.96%
Less than half of ON's -1.06%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
3.23%
Above 1.5x ON's 0.13%. Michael Burry suspects significant leverage additions. Check coverage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.44%
50-75% of ON's -4.93%. Bruce Berkowitz sees fewer new long-term commitments.
0.47%
Less than half of ON's -0.67%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.70%
Less than half of ON's -0.77%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.95%
Both ON and the company show zero Retained Earnings Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.62%
Above 1.5x ON's -1.18%. Michael Burry suspects a significant bump in 'other' equity items vs. competitor.
-8.77%
≥ 1.5x ON's -1.11%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-1.55%
≥ 1.5x ON's -0.96%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.73%
Less than half of ON's 0.13%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-32.86%
Less than half of ON's 39.54%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.