205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
12.09%
Cash & equivalents growing 12.09% while ON's declined -8.54%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.09%
Below half of ON's -6.17%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
25.69%
Receivables growth above 1.5x ON's 12.36%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
-2.17%
Inventory growth below half of ON's 0.43%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
81.97%
Above 1.5x ON's 24.29%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
18.31%
≥ 1.5x ON's 0.39%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
-3.68%
1.25-1.5x ON's -3.25%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a significant push to expand capacity faster than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.70%
Less than half of ON's -6.67%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-1.99%
Similar yoy growth to ON's -2.20%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions in non-current assets.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.24%
Below half of ON's -0.96%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
21.45%
Less than half of ON's -4.49%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.63%
Exceeding 1.5x ON's 1.11%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
7.95%
Less than half of ON's -1.06%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
20.10%
Above 1.5x ON's 0.13%. Michael Burry suspects significant leverage additions. Check coverage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.14%
Less than half of ON's -4.93%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
12.90%
Less than half of ON's -0.67%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.34%
Less than half of ON's -0.77%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.15%
Higher Retained Earnings Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.36%
Less than half of ON's -1.18%. David Dodd notes simpler yoy equity changes vs. competitor.
2.68%
Below half ON's -1.11%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
7.24%
Below half ON's -0.96%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.09%
Above 1.5x ON's 0.13%. Michael Burry sees a major jump. Investigate leverage rationale.
21.59%
50-75% of ON's 39.54%. Bruce Berkowitz notes comparatively lower net debt expansion.