205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
59.38%
Cash & equivalents growing 59.38% while ON's declined -54.40%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
59.60%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating better performance.
59.51%
Below half of ON's -19.89%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-13.69%
Similar receivables growth to ON's -13.32%. Walter Schloss would see comparable credit policies, investigating any subtle differences in sales.
-7.37%
Inventory growth 1.25-1.5x ON's -5.61%. Martin Whitman worries about slower turnover or potential markdown risk.
22.84%
Other current assets growth < half of ON's -11.71%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
22.79%
Below half of ON's -13.15%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-4.88%
≥ 1.5x ON's -1.63%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
-100.00%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.73%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.73%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Both ON and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-5.67%
Less than half of ON's 75.00%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-57.28%
1.25-1.5x ON's -45.54%. Martin Whitman might worry about unproductive asset buildup.
-22.06%
≥ 1.5x ON's -4.86%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.00%
Below half of ON's -9.06%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-64.39%
Above 1.5x ON's -5.18%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
10.00%
Less than half of ON's 52.67%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Above 1.5x ON's -40.00%. Michael Burry questions if there's an abrupt jump in tax obligations or poor payment scheduling.
457.21%
Below half of ON's -11.69%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
63.71%
Less than half of ON's -40.00%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
1.74%
Less than half of ON's -6.61%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-1.34%
Less than half of ON's 0.47%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.51%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.10%
Less than half of ON's -157.43%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-2.82%
Above 1.5x ON's -0.10%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.15%
Less than half of ON's -1.48%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.14%
Below half ON's -5.63%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-5.06%
Less than half of ON's 178.57%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.29%
Below half ON's -18.93%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
1.00%
Below half ON's -9.06%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
44.14%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating better performance.
-1.04%
Less than half of ON's 1.07%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-77.30%
Less than half of ON's 15.23%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.