205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-37.36%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-37.36% vs ON's -14.32%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
24.54%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating better performance.
1.60%
Below half of ON's -14.32%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-13.94%
Receivables growth above 1.5x ON's -1.42%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
9.93%
Inventory growth below half of ON's -1.85%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
91.74%
Above 1.5x ON's 31.80%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
0.59%
Below half of ON's -5.58%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
0.88%
0.75-0.9x ON's 1.06%. Bill Ackman questions if competitor invests more heavily in future capacity.
-100.00%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-25.72%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-25.72%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Both ON and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-4.84%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating worse performance.
174.24%
Above 1.5x ON's 37.87%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
0.43%
Below half of ON's 2.52%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.53%
Below half of ON's -1.88%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-11.81%
Less than half of ON's 32.91%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-0.66%
Less than half of ON's 278.97%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating worse performance.
6.29%
Below half of ON's -3.38%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
975.61%
Less than half of ON's -14.06%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
4.45%
Less than half of ON's 18.72%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
554.55%
Less than half of ON's -93.39%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.30%
Less than half of ON's 50.00%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-48.91%
Less than half of ON's 999.05%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-9.83%
Less than half of ON's -20.53%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.48%
Less than half of ON's -12.43%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.75%
≥ 1.5x ON's 2.74%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
53.14%
Less than half of ON's -76.67%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.54%
Below half ON's 37.70%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
0.53%
Below half ON's -1.88%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
16.30%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating better performance.
84.64%
Less than half of ON's -6.20%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
64.86%
Less than half of ON's -3.64%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.