205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-3.59%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-3.59% vs ON's -5.07%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-14.15%
Both ON and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-9.32%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x ON's -5.07%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
6.23%
Receivables growth less than half of ON's 13.83%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
3.93%
Inventory growth below half of ON's -1.25%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
17.96%
Above 1.5x ON's 1.91%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
0.45%
Below half of ON's 1.06%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
0.12%
Below half ON's 0.54%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.14%
50-75% of ON's -8.44%. Bruce Berkowitz notes moderate intangible additions. Check if growth is organically driven.
-1.35%
Less than half of ON's -4.45%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
1.82%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating better performance.
32.00%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-3.75%
Less than half of ON's 2035.69%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-0.25%
Below half of ON's 113.78%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.04%
Below half of ON's 58.17%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
7.49%
Less than half of ON's -1.11%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-49.00%
Less than half of ON's 2.15%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
-13.43%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-13.43%
Below half of ON's 5.14%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
45.00%
Similar yoy changes to ON's 41.94%. Walter Schloss finds parallel near-term liability trends.
-17.73%
Less than half of ON's 5.98%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
3.69%
Less than half of ON's 251.47%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.26%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating worse performance.
25.65%
Above 1.5x ON's 15.74%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
7.35%
Less than half of ON's 215.07%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.93%
Less than half of ON's 100.83%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.25%
Below half ON's 3.73%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-0.94%
Less than half of ON's 4.60%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.84%
0.5-0.75x ON's 2.84%. Martin Whitman is wary of lagging equity growth vs. competitor.
0.04%
Below half ON's 58.17%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-12.13%
Both ON and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-12.29%
Less than half of ON's 155.19%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-16.21%
Less than half of ON's 289.16%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.