205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-15.70%
Cash & equivalents declining -15.70% while ON's grows 16.76%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
32.13%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating better performance.
11.25%
Cash + STI yoy 0.5-0.75x ON's 16.76%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging short-term reserves. Confirm debt coverage.
-12.44%
Receivables growth above 1.5x ON's -6.71%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
-1.00%
Inventory growth below half of ON's -4.88%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
15.34%
1.25-1.5x ON's 10.57%. Martin Whitman worries about added complexity or intangible expansions.
3.84%
≥ 1.5x ON's 2.38%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
-1.30%
Below half ON's 4.07%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.60%
Above 1.5x ON's -2.75%. Michael Burry might suspect inflated intangible valuations or questionable M&A additions.
-1.36%
Less than half of ON's -5.18%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
0.86%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating better performance.
5.35%
Less than half of ON's 173.43%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
19.86%
Less than half of ON's -16.27%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-0.68%
Below half of ON's 1.67%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.33%
0.5-0.75x ON's 1.97%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
-7.48%
Less than half of ON's 6.50%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-0.47%
Less than half of ON's 2.44%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
22.06%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating worse performance.
450.00%
Below half of ON's -8.96%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
12.98%
Less than half of ON's -18.36%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
4.33%
Above 1.5x ON's 0.31%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
0.03%
Less than half of ON's -0.88%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.71%
Less than half of ON's 16.40%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-8.69%
Less than half of ON's 12.46%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-1.76%
Less than half of ON's 1.07%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.47%
50-75% of ON's 0.84%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a lower yoy liability increase.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.08%
Below half ON's 17.38%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
2.95%
Less than half of ON's -30.05%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.82%
Below half ON's 5.35%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
1.33%
0.5-0.75x ON's 1.97%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
28.49%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating better performance.
-0.06%
Less than half of ON's -0.39%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
9.50%
Less than half of ON's -5.86%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.