205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
3.68%
Cash & equivalents growing 3.68% while ON's declined -2.56%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
-16.03%
Both ON and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-8.73%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x ON's -2.56%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
13.77%
Receivables growth less than half of ON's -0.66%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
3.83%
Inventory growth 50-75% of ON's 6.47%. Bruce Berkowitz sees relatively tighter stock. Confirm sales aren't sacrificed.
-0.49%
Other current assets growth < half of ON's -4.04%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-1.65%
Below half of ON's 1.15%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.70%
Similar yoy growth to ON's 2.51%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital spending strategies. Check utilization rates.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.33%
Above 1.5x ON's -4.36%. Michael Burry might suspect inflated intangible valuations or questionable M&A additions.
-1.62%
Similar yoy changes to ON's -1.77%. Walter Schloss sees parallel intangible strategies or acquisitions.
1.12%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating better performance.
-17.42%
Above 1.5x ON's -1.71%. Michael Burry suspects major tax losses or deferrals building up, raising concerns about sustained profitability.
23.13%
Above 1.5x ON's 10.25%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
0.10%
Below half of ON's 0.80%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.77%
Below half of ON's 0.95%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
4.72%
Less than half of ON's 11.68%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.91%
Below half of ON's -54.52%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
3.91%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating better performance.
-10.63%
Exceeding 1.5x ON's -3.84%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-17.63%
Less than half of ON's 38.05%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.03%
Less than half of ON's -22.91%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-87.29%
Both ON and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
-32.05%
Less than half of ON's 3.63%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-1.29%
Above 1.5x ON's -0.57%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
-0.83%
Less than half of ON's -20.72%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.02%
Above 1.5x ON's -1.88%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.76%
Below half ON's 39.89%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-2.08%
Less than half of ON's 15.27%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.95%
0.5-0.75x ON's 5.38%. Martin Whitman is wary of lagging equity growth vs. competitor.
-0.77%
Below half ON's 0.95%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-14.54%
Both ON and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
0.02%
Less than half of ON's -4.07%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-2.48%
50-75% of ON's -4.79%. Bruce Berkowitz notes comparatively lower net debt expansion.