205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
49.43%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth at least 1.5x ON's 4.66%. Mohnish Pabrai might see this as a favorable liquidity edge, provided funds are well deployed.
-11.85%
Both ON and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
10.53%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x ON's 4.66%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
0.44%
Receivables growth less than half of ON's -2.12%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-1.80%
Inventory growth below half of ON's 1.07%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
38.78%
Other current assets growth < half of ON's -3.37%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
7.42%
≥ 1.5x ON's 1.33%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
7.20%
Below half ON's -1.27%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.44%
Above 1.5x ON's -5.62%. Michael Burry might suspect inflated intangible valuations or questionable M&A additions.
-1.35%
1.1-1.25x ON's -1.18%. Bill Ackman might question if intangible expansions are riskier than competitor's approach.
8.09%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating better performance.
-1.51%
Less than half of ON's -3.87%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-1.07%
Similar yoy growth to ON's -1.15%. Walter Schloss sees parallel approach in non-core expansions.
2.08%
Below half of ON's -1.44%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.91%
Below half of ON's -0.42%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
3.53%
Above 1.5x ON's 0.86%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.51%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.14%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating worse performance.
29.47%
Less than half of ON's -15.89%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-7.97%
Less than half of ON's 3.57%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
0.77%
Higher Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating better performance.
-1.14%
Less than half of ON's -7.61%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-1.74%
50-75% of ON's -2.63%. Bruce Berkowitz sees fewer new long-term commitments.
-6.74%
Less than half of ON's 2.59%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.24%
Less than half of ON's -3.83%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.30%
Below half ON's 12.15%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
6.92%
Similar yoy to ON's 6.62%. Walter Schloss sees parallel comprehensive income changes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.71%
≥ 1.5x ON's 4.26%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
4.91%
Below half ON's -0.42%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-11.85%
Both ON and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
0.02%
Less than half of ON's -7.03%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-31.67%
Above 1.5x ON's -12.33%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.