205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-24.31%
Cash & equivalents declining -24.31% while ON's grows 21.63%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
23.73%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating better performance.
0.88%
Below half of ON's 21.63%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
5.53%
Receivables growth less than half of ON's 12.52%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
7.85%
Similar inventory growth to ON's 8.45%. Walter Schloss notes comparable inventory strategies or sector norms.
-1.49%
Other current assets growth < half of ON's 31.45%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
2.37%
Below half of ON's 15.49%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
5.80%
≥ 1.5x ON's 1.39%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.06%
Less than half of ON's -4.28%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
0.13%
Less than half of ON's -0.90%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-87.24%
Both ON and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
3.80%
Less than half of ON's -4.64%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
40.51%
Less than half of ON's -2.09%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
2.50%
≥ 1.5x ON's 0.01%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.43%
Below half of ON's 6.09%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-1.84%
Less than half of ON's 14.20%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
234.71%
Below half of ON's -100.00%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.98%
50-75% of ON's -81.14%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a more controlled liability line.
-1.60%
Less than half of ON's 1.47%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.01%
Less than half of ON's 4.17%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Both ON and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
8.05%
Less than half of ON's -5.32%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
31.23%
Above 1.5x ON's 9.35%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
-0.49%
Less than half of ON's 4.32%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.74%
Less than half of ON's 3.44%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.47%
Below half ON's 22.89%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
2.55%
Less than half of ON's 34.98%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.13%
0.5-0.75x ON's 9.00%. Martin Whitman is wary of lagging equity growth vs. competitor.
2.43%
Below half ON's 6.09%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
23.73%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating better performance.
0.01%
Less than half of ON's 4.27%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
36.24%
Less than half of ON's -9.37%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.