205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
15.51%
Cash & equivalents growing 15.51% while ON's declined -7.32%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
-12.08%
Both ON and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-4.17%
Cash + STI yoy 0.5-0.75x ON's -7.32%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging short-term reserves. Confirm debt coverage.
-9.56%
Receivables growth above 1.5x ON's -2.38%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
2.33%
Inventory growth above 1.5x ON's 1.30%. Michael Burry might suspect a looming inventory glut. Check free cash flow impact.
187.17%
Above 1.5x ON's 5.20%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
0.17%
Below half of ON's -2.84%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
7.29%
≥ 1.5x ON's 1.98%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.59%
Less than half of ON's -4.32%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
1.89%
Less than half of ON's -0.71%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
521.69%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating better performance.
19.78%
Above 1.5x ON's 3.71%. Michael Burry suspects major tax losses or deferrals building up, raising concerns about sustained profitability.
-55.64%
Less than half of ON's 0.16%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
4.14%
≥ 1.5x ON's 1.49%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.24%
Below half of ON's -0.50%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
12.48%
Less than half of ON's -20.38%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
99.67%
Less than half of ON's -13.02%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
59.26%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating worse performance.
59.26%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to ON's zero value, indicating better performance.
70.63%
Less than half of ON's 270.46%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
25.19%
Less than half of ON's -12.47%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-2.73%
Less than half of ON's 0.06%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-23.40%
Both ON and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
-4.55%
Less than half of ON's 10.26%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-29.33%
Above 1.5x ON's -8.38%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
-1.81%
1.1-1.25x ON's -1.57%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is outpacing competitor in long-term leverage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.96%
Less than half of ON's -6.28%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.36%
Below half ON's 9.40%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
12.77%
Less than half of ON's -0.67%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.60%
Below half ON's 3.99%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
2.24%
Below half ON's -0.50%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-12.08%
Both ON and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
0.01%
Less than half of ON's -3.48%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-4.59%
Less than half of ON's 9.38%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.