205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-5.39%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-5.39% vs QCOM's -12.83%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.39%
Below half of QCOM's -12.83%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-2.63%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's 1.64%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-1.72%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 15.79%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
53.15%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's 115.69%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
4.75%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 1.74%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
-2.09%
Below half QCOM's 1.09%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.40%
Less than half of QCOM's 69.23%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-1.15%
Below half of QCOM's 5.61%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.81%
0.5-0.75x QCOM's 2.50%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
-1.61%
Less than half of QCOM's 5.41%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-26.83%
Less than half of QCOM's 3.45%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.70%
Less than half of QCOM's 20.77%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
2.11%
Less than half of QCOM's 13.73%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-0.97%
50-75% of QCOM's -1.39%. Bruce Berkowitz notes less new LT debt than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.74%
Less than half of QCOM's -19.05%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
1.25%
Less than half of QCOM's -5.38%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.69%
Less than half of QCOM's 8.28%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.11%
Below half QCOM's -1.17%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.60%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 0.34%. Michael Burry suspects a significant bump in 'other' equity items vs. competitor.
1.99%
Below half QCOM's -0.30%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
1.81%
0.5-0.75x QCOM's 2.50%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.06%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.96%
Less than half of QCOM's 16.52%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
