PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
33.17%
Cash & equivalents growing 33.17% while QCOM's declined -50.87%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
27.27%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating better performance.
29.95%
Below half of QCOM's -50.87%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
10.84%
Receivables growth 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 8.50%. Martin Whitman would worry that the company may be booking revenue too aggressively.
2.55%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 26.24%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
0.60%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's 29.65%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
12.91%
Below half of QCOM's -6.05%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
1.59%
Below half QCOM's 16.85%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.21%
Less than half of QCOM's 292.86%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
0.49%
Below half of QCOM's 28.73%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.36%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 1.34%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-58.27%
Less than half of QCOM's 1.36%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
13.74%
Less than half of QCOM's -17.86%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both QCOM and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-100.00%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
13.49%
Less than half of QCOM's -1.47%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-1.59%
Less than half of QCOM's -3.61%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.42%
Less than half of QCOM's -17.07%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
0.18%
Less than half of QCOM's -5.52%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.42%
Less than half of QCOM's -3.15%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
1.10%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
8.95%
0.5-0.75x QCOM's 12.35%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
-10.00%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.26%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 2.66%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
7.36%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 1.34%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
27.27%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating better performance.
1.99%
Less than half of QCOM's -6.23%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-23.15%
Less than half of QCOM's 71.19%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.