PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-3.16%
Cash & equivalents declining -3.16% while QCOM's grows 28.81%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
9.58%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating better performance.
3.64%
Below half of QCOM's 28.81%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
7.11%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's 26.76%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
4.86%
Inventory growth 50-75% of QCOM's 8.43%. Bruce Berkowitz sees relatively tighter stock. Confirm sales aren't sacrificed.
2.70%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's -10.39%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
5.10%
Similar yoy growth to QCOM's 5.42%. Walter Schloss notes comparable short-term expansions. Investigate quality of these assets.
4.02%
0.5-0.75x QCOM's 7.83%. Martin Whitman might see a risk of falling behind in asset investment or shifting strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.42%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-17.05%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -10.91%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
1.93%
Below half of QCOM's 5.37%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.78%
0.5-0.75x QCOM's 5.41%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
5.07%
Less than half of QCOM's 30.54%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-7.50%
1.1-1.25x QCOM's -6.52%. Bill Ackman would question if the company shoulders more immediate debt than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.63%
Less than half of QCOM's 23.08%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.73%
Less than half of QCOM's -2.50%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.80%
Less than half of QCOM's 2.94%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
0.77%
Less than half of QCOM's -1.82%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.27%
Less than half of QCOM's 13.00%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.31%
0.5-0.75x QCOM's 15.49%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.77%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 3.29%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
3.78%
0.5-0.75x QCOM's 5.41%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
9.58%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating better performance.
-1.41%
Less than half of QCOM's -3.15%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
1.04%
Less than half of QCOM's -76.17%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.