PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
36.85%
Cash & equivalents growing 36.85% while QCOM's declined -45.22%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
-21.78%
Both QCOM and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
3.76%
Below half of QCOM's -45.22%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
0.83%
Similar receivables growth to QCOM's 0.85%. Walter Schloss would see comparable credit policies, investigating any subtle differences in sales.
-1.58%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 1.04%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-2.34%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's 6.65%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
0.92%
Below half of QCOM's -8.32%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
5.11%
Below half QCOM's 35.80%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.63%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-3.89%
Less than half of QCOM's 25.51%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
4.74%
Below half of QCOM's 34.65%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.49%
0.75-0.9x QCOM's 3.27%. Bill Ackman questions if competitor invests more aggressively for growth.
-5.28%
Less than half of QCOM's 6.94%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-81.08%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -6.98%. Michael Burry sees a major discrepancy in short-term leverage. Check coverage and liquidity carefully.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.37%
Less than half of QCOM's 1.81%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
18.17%
Less than half of QCOM's -0.85%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.19%
Less than half of QCOM's 5.71%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
6.08%
Higher Total Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.52%
Less than half of QCOM's 1.18%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
1.09%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
10.28%
Below half QCOM's 21.33%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-9.09%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.99%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 3.90%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
2.49%
0.75-0.9x QCOM's 3.27%. Bill Ackman wonders if competitor invests or leverages more aggressively.
-21.78%
Both QCOM and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-6.04%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -1.81%. Michael Burry sees a major jump. Investigate leverage rationale.
-63.50%
Less than half of QCOM's 80.59%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.