205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
20.66%
Cash & equivalents growing 20.66% while QCOM's declined -38.00%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
-19.43%
Both QCOM and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
4.19%
Below half of QCOM's -38.00%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
15.40%
Receivables growth above 1.5x QCOM's 0.79%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
7.03%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 41.67%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
5.34%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's -21.73%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
8.61%
Below half of QCOM's -14.14%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
0.78%
Below half QCOM's 6.51%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.23%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
39.13%
50-75% of QCOM's 69.07%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower 'other assets' expansions.
2.89%
Below half of QCOM's 17.26%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.18%
Below half of QCOM's -2.10%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-64.30%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -30.34%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
341.67%
Less than half of QCOM's -5.41%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both QCOM and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-100.00%
Less than half of QCOM's 24.62%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
6.64%
Less than half of QCOM's -23.84%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-1.98%
Less than half of QCOM's 5.49%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.21%
Less than half of QCOM's 28.57%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
2.97%
Less than half of QCOM's 7.92%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.01%
Less than half of QCOM's -15.05%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.83%
Below half QCOM's 23.32%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-232600.00%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.70%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 2.63%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
6.18%
Below half QCOM's -2.10%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-19.43%
Both QCOM and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
3.05%
Similar yoy changes to QCOM's 4.01%. Walter Schloss notes parallel total debt strategies.
-220.00%
Less than half of QCOM's 103.41%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.