PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
5.45%
Cash & equivalents growing 5.45% while QCOM's declined -3.23%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
13.58%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating better performance.
8.04%
Below half of QCOM's -3.23%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
16.65%
Similar receivables growth to QCOM's 15.46%. Walter Schloss would see comparable credit policies, investigating any subtle differences in sales.
7.20%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's -10.86%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-1.69%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's -6.45%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
10.34%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 0.84%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
3.32%
Below half QCOM's 13.38%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.66%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.68%
Less than half of QCOM's -31.58%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
2.91%
Below half of QCOM's 9.69%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.28%
1.25-1.5x QCOM's 4.91%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a stronger asset build. Check if it's producing returns.
18.96%
1.1-1.25x QCOM's 16.55%. Bill Ackman wonders if the firm relies on extended payables to manage cash flow.
-49.06%
1.1-1.25x QCOM's -40.00%. Bill Ackman would question if the company shoulders more immediate debt than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.85%
50-75% of QCOM's 11.39%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the firm keeps current liabilities growth relatively low.
3.54%
Less than half of QCOM's 8.40%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.25%
Less than half of QCOM's -8.33%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
3.94%
50-75% of QCOM's 6.29%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a smaller yoy liability buildup than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.15%
50-75% of QCOM's 9.59%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a lower yoy liability increase.
1.08%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
11.61%
Below half QCOM's 31.44%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-1.07%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.71%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 3.49%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
7.28%
1.25-1.5x QCOM's 4.91%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions are well-justified by ROI.
13.58%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating better performance.
0.24%
Less than half of QCOM's 2.46%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-66.67%
Less than half of QCOM's 266.67%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.