205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
31.13%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth below half of QCOM's 141.48%. Michael Burry would question if the firm faces a liquidity squeeze. Check for rising debts or negative cash flow.
-30.93%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's -67.19%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
10.40%
Below half of QCOM's 141.48%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
13.60%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's -5.19%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
5.04%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 60.91%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
3.15%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's -56.54%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
9.74%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 3.25%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
6.77%
0.5-0.75x QCOM's 11.65%. Martin Whitman might see a risk of falling behind in asset investment or shifting strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.71%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
9.63%
Less than half of QCOM's 34.43%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
6.80%
Below half of QCOM's 14.38%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.58%
Similar yoy to QCOM's 8.60%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions. Evaluate the quality of these assets.
12.05%
Less than half of QCOM's 42.17%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
137.04%
Less than half of QCOM's -28.57%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.43%
Less than half of QCOM's 32.20%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.24%
Less than half of QCOM's 7.01%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.37%
Less than half of QCOM's 6.06%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
1.44%
Less than half of QCOM's 6.91%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.90%
Less than half of QCOM's 23.57%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
101.06%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
10.87%
Below half QCOM's 54.14%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-1.36%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.18%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 3.81%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
8.58%
Similar yoy to QCOM's 8.60%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in total capital.
-30.93%
0.5-0.75x QCOM's -56.58%. Martin Whitman sees possible missed opportunities vs. competitor.
4.60%
Similar yoy changes to QCOM's 4.45%. Walter Schloss notes parallel total debt strategies.
-218.33%
Less than half of QCOM's -1677.27%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.