PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-6.23%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-6.23% vs QCOM's -38.53%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-72.49%
Both QCOM and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-14.29%
Below half of QCOM's -38.53%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-1.06%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's 30.23%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
1.41%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 62.05%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-40.36%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's 117.21%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-8.16%
1.25-1.5x QCOM's -7.10%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if strong current asset growth is used effectively.
10.32%
Below half QCOM's 29.76%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.31%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
11.03%
Less than half of QCOM's 30.63%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
9.66%
Below half of QCOM's 29.94%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.01%
Below half of QCOM's 2.20%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-57.46%
Less than half of QCOM's 13.99%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
37.04%
Less than half of QCOM's -50.00%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both QCOM and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-100.00%
Less than half of QCOM's 36.59%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-18.54%
Less than half of QCOM's 15.14%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
37.44%
Less than half of QCOM's -17.61%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.41%
Less than half of QCOM's -23.08%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
18.74%
Less than half of QCOM's -18.01%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.47%
Less than half of QCOM's 6.66%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.55%
Below half QCOM's 212.50%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
6.67%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.32%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 1.41%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-1.01%
Below half QCOM's 2.20%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-72.49%
Both QCOM and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
37.42%
Less than half of QCOM's -18.55%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
74.30%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 40.01%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.