PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
42.60%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth at least 1.5x QCOM's 10.76%. Mohnish Pabrai might see this as a favorable liquidity edge, provided funds are well deployed.
75.00%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating better performance.
42.98%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x QCOM's 10.76%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-17.25%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's 12.41%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-29.91%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 32.23%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
94.94%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 11.59%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
1.41%
Below half of QCOM's 15.84%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-4.15%
Below half QCOM's 18.47%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.73%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-8.46%
Similar yoy growth to QCOM's -7.92%. Walter Schloss sees parallel approach in non-core expansions.
-5.01%
Below half of QCOM's 12.43%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.06%
Below half of QCOM's 14.57%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
140.10%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 49.41%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
51.69%
Less than half of QCOM's 6276.92%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.01%
Less than half of QCOM's 96.86%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
1.19%
Less than half of QCOM's -70.78%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.05%
Less than half of QCOM's 75.00%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-4.41%
Less than half of QCOM's -63.36%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.29%
Less than half of QCOM's 66.13%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.12%
Below half QCOM's 44.69%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
73.81%
Less than half of QCOM's -76.66%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.44%
Below half QCOM's 1.83%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-2.06%
Below half QCOM's 14.57%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
75.00%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating better performance.
6.74%
Less than half of QCOM's 143.01%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-13.33%
Less than half of QCOM's 73.19%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.