205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-33.57%
Cash & equivalents declining -33.57% while QCOM's grows 220.59%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
747.62%
Short-term investments yoy growth ≥ 1.5x QCOM's 188.32%. David Dodd would see a more robust near-cash position, but confirm efficient allocation.
13.21%
Below half of QCOM's 202.46%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
4.12%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's 35.93%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
11.16%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's -15.35%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-0.42%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's -6.85%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
6.33%
Below half of QCOM's 75.64%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
0.68%
Below half QCOM's 3.26%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.30%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-28.39%
Less than half of QCOM's 71.79%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-3.22%
Below half of QCOM's 14.66%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.34%
Below half of QCOM's 55.50%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
14.72%
1.25-1.5x QCOM's 9.87%. Martin Whitman sees potential reliance on supplier financing. Verify liquidity.
-85.87%
Less than half of QCOM's 2.20%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.27%
Less than half of QCOM's 7.44%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
1.46%
Less than half of QCOM's -8.13%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.62%
Less than half of QCOM's 68.11%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
2.32%
Less than half of QCOM's 13.81%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.09%
Less than half of QCOM's 7.64%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.52%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
7.42%
Below half QCOM's 47.86%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-116.67%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.41%
1.25-1.5x QCOM's 3.88%. Bruce Berkowitz notes an above-average equity expansion.
1.34%
Below half QCOM's 55.50%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
747.62%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 179.29%. David Dodd sees far stronger investment expansions than competitor.
-14.52%
Less than half of QCOM's 1.50%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
3.91%
Less than half of QCOM's -1186.54%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.