205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
315.07%
Cash & equivalents growing 315.07% while QCOM's declined -46.55%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
182.58%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's -0.91%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
255.67%
Below half of QCOM's -22.10%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-0.17%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's -2.09%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
2.85%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 10.35%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-44.06%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's 144.54%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
56.11%
Below half of QCOM's -10.24%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
0.92%
Below half QCOM's 5.20%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.27%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.49%
Less than half of QCOM's 49.71%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
1.02%
Below half of QCOM's 33.88%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.62%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 0.50%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-13.37%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -4.26%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
65.38%
Less than half of QCOM's -48.03%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.28%
Less than half of QCOM's -15.52%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-7.62%
Similar yoy to QCOM's -8.52%. Walter Schloss sees parallel approaches to long-term financing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.69%
Less than half of QCOM's 123.53%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-3.49%
Less than half of QCOM's 47.61%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.86%
Less than half of QCOM's -13.44%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
1.56%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
53.69%
0.75-0.9x QCOM's 69.48%. Bill Ackman questions if competitor reinvests profits more robustly.
19.23%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.61%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 8.59%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
28.62%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 0.50%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
182.58%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 16.74%. David Dodd sees far stronger investment expansions than competitor.
-5.41%
Less than half of QCOM's -45.62%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-203.67%
Less than half of QCOM's 47.10%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.