PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-18.23%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-18.23% vs QCOM's -15.79%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-23.39%
Short-term investments yoy growth ≥ 1.5x QCOM's -1.02%. David Dodd would see a more robust near-cash position, but confirm efficient allocation.
-21.66%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x QCOM's -6.29%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-2.29%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's 11.37%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
4.58%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 25.07%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-0.17%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's -2.27%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-10.70%
Below half of QCOM's 4.79%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.46%
Below half QCOM's 11.78%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.44%
Less than half of QCOM's -28.23%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
3.67%
Below half of QCOM's 10.67%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.42%
Below half of QCOM's 6.67%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-67.82%
Less than half of QCOM's 32.37%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-5.63%
Less than half of QCOM's -28.19%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both QCOM and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-100.00%
Less than half of QCOM's 1.52%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-20.47%
Less than half of QCOM's 17.83%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-3.11%
Less than half of QCOM's -8.31%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.78%
Less than half of QCOM's 16.13%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-1.27%
Less than half of QCOM's 7.93%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.98%
Less than half of QCOM's 17.45%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.26%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.25%
Below half QCOM's 31.21%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-13.21%
Less than half of QCOM's 100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.07%
Below half QCOM's 4.75%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-4.42%
Below half QCOM's 6.67%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-23.39%
Below half QCOM's 24.04%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-3.24%
Less than half of QCOM's -26.92%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
41.23%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 5.27%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.