PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
65.37%
Cash & equivalents growing 65.37% while QCOM's declined -24.97%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
-23.00%
Short-term investments yoy growth 1.25-1.5x QCOM's -17.25%. Bruce Berkowitz might examine if there's a temporary reason for higher holdings.
-1.78%
Below half of QCOM's -21.73%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
7.14%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's 37.48%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
7.55%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's -13.31%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-2.38%
Other current assets growth 50-75% of QCOM's -4.21%. Bruce Berkowitz notes fewer expansions. Possibly simpler working capital.
2.52%
Below half of QCOM's 8.17%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-1.39%
Below half QCOM's 3.50%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.70%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-6.91%
Less than half of QCOM's 11.80%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-4.01%
Below half of QCOM's 6.84%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.20%
Below half of QCOM's 7.64%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-66.69%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -0.46%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
-2.62%
Less than half of QCOM's 88.88%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both QCOM and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-100.00%
Exceeding 1.5x QCOM's -12.84%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-6.97%
Less than half of QCOM's 14.21%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-3.70%
Less than half of QCOM's -19.34%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.09%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-6.17%
Less than half of QCOM's 43.47%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-5.30%
Less than half of QCOM's 35.10%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.08%
Less than half of QCOM's 14.87%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.26%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
4.17%
Higher Retained Earnings Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating better performance.
3.38%
Less than half of QCOM's 100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
100.00%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2.33%
Below half QCOM's 5.96%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-1.20%
Below half QCOM's 7.64%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-23.00%
1.25-1.5x QCOM's -17.63%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if robust new investments are prudent.
-3.48%
Less than half of QCOM's 86.28%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-52.79%
Less than half of QCOM's 1005.07%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.