PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-62.60%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-62.60% vs QCOM's -8.10%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
7.07%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's -20.94%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-21.10%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x QCOM's -13.80%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
18.90%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's -4.93%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
7.49%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's -24.05%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-3.66%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's 25.72%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-2.96%
Below half of QCOM's -6.89%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.44%
Below half QCOM's -11.59%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.95%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.68%
Less than half of QCOM's 9.85%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
1.29%
Below half of QCOM's -2.44%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.61%
Below half of QCOM's -5.12%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
3.55%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 0.83%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
1.15%
Less than half of QCOM's -76.96%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.71%
Less than half of QCOM's -21.27%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-2.93%
Less than half of QCOM's -24.26%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.42%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.48%
Less than half of QCOM's 23.25%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-6.06%
Less than half of QCOM's 19.47%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.48%
Less than half of QCOM's -19.75%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.25%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
6.01%
Below half QCOM's -87.82%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-57.52%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.63%
Below half QCOM's 6.13%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-0.61%
Below half QCOM's -5.12%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
7.07%
Below half QCOM's -20.95%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-2.08%
Less than half of QCOM's -76.40%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
149.72%
Less than half of QCOM's -131.95%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.