205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-29.47%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-29.47% vs QCOM's -7.75%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
30.67%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's -9.18%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
11.15%
Below half of QCOM's -8.53%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
12.58%
Receivables growth above 1.5x QCOM's 6.43%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
10.11%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's -5.07%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
2.34%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's -23.84%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
10.41%
Below half of QCOM's -6.60%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
8.18%
Below half QCOM's -0.58%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
118.24%
Less than half of QCOM's -6.27%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
118.24%
Less than half of QCOM's -6.27%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.16%
Less than half of QCOM's 261.71%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-44.42%
1.1-1.25x QCOM's -38.13%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm invests in intangible or other non-core areas more aggressively.
-17.48%
Below half of QCOM's 12.35%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.23%
Below half of QCOM's 3.71%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
9.38%
Less than half of QCOM's -14.74%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-47.01%
Less than half of QCOM's -100.00%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.54%
50-75% of QCOM's -12.34%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the firm keeps current liabilities growth relatively low.
25.57%
Less than half of QCOM's -100.00%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.35%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-5.96%
Less than half of QCOM's -28.53%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-19.97%
50-75% of QCOM's -29.02%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a smaller yoy liability buildup than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.37%
Similar yoy to QCOM's -13.63%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in total liabilities.
5.48%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
11.70%
Below half QCOM's 26.78%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-67.54%
Less than half of QCOM's -138.27%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.81%
Below half QCOM's 5.76%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-6.23%
Below half QCOM's 3.71%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
30.67%
1.25-1.5x QCOM's 23.98%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if robust new investments are prudent.
4.89%
Less than half of QCOM's -100.00%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
2180.95%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 7.68%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.