PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-59.19%
Cash & equivalents declining -59.19% while QCOM's grows 15.27%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
-14.52%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's 8.65%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-22.83%
Below half of QCOM's 11.33%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-11.62%
Receivables growth 1.25-1.5x QCOM's -9.08%. Martin Whitman would worry that the company may be booking revenue too aggressively.
-4.30%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's -8.86%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-8.07%
1.25-1.5x QCOM's -5.57%. Martin Whitman worries about added complexity or intangible expansions.
-14.92%
Below half of QCOM's 4.35%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
10.02%
Below half QCOM's -1.92%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.05%
1.25-1.5x QCOM's -6.98%. Martin Whitman sees potential overreliance on intangible expansions vs. competitor.
-9.05%
1.25-1.5x QCOM's -6.98%. Martin Whitman worried about intangible heavy expansions vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.43%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
8.54%
Less than half of QCOM's -25.76%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
7.63%
Below half of QCOM's -18.04%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.70%
Below half of QCOM's -7.96%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-58.62%
Less than half of QCOM's 14.35%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-68.92%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both QCOM and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-100.00%
Less than half of QCOM's 2.71%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-33.06%
Less than half of QCOM's 5.49%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.99%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.54%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.64%
Less than half of QCOM's -12.71%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.38%
Less than half of QCOM's 4.48%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.23%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2.08%
Below half QCOM's -26.26%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
35.23%
Less than half of QCOM's -550.38%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.29%
Below half QCOM's -9.18%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-2.70%
Below half QCOM's -7.96%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-14.52%
Below half QCOM's 8.65%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-6.60%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
56.70%
Less than half of QCOM's -15.27%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.