205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
78.29%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth at least 1.5x QCOM's 34.85%. Mohnish Pabrai might see this as a favorable liquidity edge, provided funds are well deployed.
-11.24%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's -29.29%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-2.43%
Similar yoy growth to QCOM's -2.43%. Walter Schloss would note comparable liquidity expansions. Examine capital usage strategies.
-14.48%
Similar receivables growth to QCOM's -19.26%. Walter Schloss would see comparable credit policies, investigating any subtle differences in sales.
-8.31%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 16.80%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-27.97%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's 159.94%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-9.07%
Below half of QCOM's 1.50%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-0.83%
Below half QCOM's 0.18%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.15%
50-75% of QCOM's -7.67%. Bruce Berkowitz notes moderate intangible additions. Check if growth is organically driven.
-5.15%
50-75% of QCOM's -7.67%. Bruce Berkowitz notes lower intangible reliance than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
116.38%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.37%
Less than half of QCOM's 21.36%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
0.83%
Below half of QCOM's 9.95%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.13%
Below half of QCOM's 5.64%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
74.21%
Less than half of QCOM's -3.26%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-6.52%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.95%
Similar yoy to QCOM's -15.03%. Walter Schloss sees parallel short-term liability strategies.
-2.12%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.46%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
12.30%
Less than half of QCOM's 631.17%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
0.85%
Less than half of QCOM's 631.17%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.83%
Less than half of QCOM's 14.90%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.17%
Less than half of QCOM's 1.33%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-2.47%
Below half QCOM's 23.21%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-3.36%
Less than half of QCOM's -79.67%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.58%
Below half QCOM's 4.71%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-3.13%
Below half QCOM's 5.64%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-11.24%
Below half QCOM's 4.72%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-2.28%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-27.53%
Similar yoy changes to QCOM's -34.85%. Walter Schloss sees parallel net leverage strategies.