205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-28.60%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-28.60% vs QCOM's -13.36%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
5.38%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's 16.68%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-0.73%
Similar yoy growth to QCOM's -0.71%. Walter Schloss would note comparable liquidity expansions. Examine capital usage strategies.
-13.03%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's 0.93%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-16.82%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 23.94%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-2.79%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's 64.76%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-2.77%
Below half of QCOM's 7.97%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-1.90%
Below half QCOM's 3.94%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.46%
50-75% of QCOM's -8.36%. Bruce Berkowitz notes moderate intangible additions. Check if growth is organically driven.
-4.46%
50-75% of QCOM's -8.36%. Bruce Berkowitz notes lower intangible reliance than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
84.06%
Less than half of QCOM's -97.18%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-39.55%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -17.41%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
-12.32%
Similar yoy growth to QCOM's -12.27%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions in non-current assets.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.73%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's -2.34%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-1.30%
Less than half of QCOM's 0.51%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-2.33%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-78.57%
Below half of QCOM's 10.43%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
14.94%
Less than half of QCOM's -21.14%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-2.23%
Less than half of QCOM's -10.93%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
1.66%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.01%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.95%
Less than half of QCOM's 0.58%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-12.71%
Less than half of QCOM's 0.58%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.40%
1.1-1.25x QCOM's -7.53%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is incurring more total obligations than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.66%
Below half QCOM's -34.71%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-149.91%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -21.11%. Michael Burry sees a significant jump in intangible or market-based gains. Scrutinize risk of reversal.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.83%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's -1.78%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-8.73%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's -2.34%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
5.38%
Below half QCOM's 42.80%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
1.53%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
24.75%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 13.36%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.