205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-27.38%
Cash & equivalents declining -27.38% while QCOM's grows 7.00%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
-8.40%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's 2.80%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-11.18%
Below half of QCOM's 5.36%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
4.26%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's 11.28%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
2.26%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's -10.23%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
8.66%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's -5.41%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-4.90%
Below half of QCOM's 5.31%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-5.15%
Below half QCOM's 73.98%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-26.74%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -9.59%. Michael Burry warns of potential big write-downs if synergy fails.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.07%
Less than half of QCOM's -9.59%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.63%
1.1-1.25x QCOM's -31.50%. Bill Ackman wonders if the company booked more losses or deferrals than competitor.
15.03%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 9.55%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
0.42%
Below half of QCOM's 15.71%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.53%
Below half of QCOM's 10.18%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-8.38%
Less than half of QCOM's 100.79%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
21.05%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.00%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 16.15%. David Dodd sees stronger subscription/prepayment demand.
-16.82%
Less than half of QCOM's 17.44%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-9.05%
Less than half of QCOM's 34.01%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-0.41%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.53%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-6.04%
Less than half of QCOM's 291.42%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-2.89%
Less than half of QCOM's 26.80%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.38%
Less than half of QCOM's 31.21%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.84%
Below half QCOM's 19.18%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
48.09%
1.1-1.25x QCOM's 39.62%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm has more exposure to market fluctuations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.26%
Below half QCOM's 4.52%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-1.53%
Below half QCOM's 10.18%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-8.40%
Below half QCOM's 41.54%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
0.24%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
14.79%
Less than half of QCOM's -7.00%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.