205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
97.95%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth at least 1.5x QCOM's 1.04%. Mohnish Pabrai might see this as a favorable liquidity edge, provided funds are well deployed.
-18.10%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's 16.41%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
4.78%
Cash + STI yoy 0.5-0.75x QCOM's 7.60%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging short-term reserves. Confirm debt coverage.
-2.08%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's 8.41%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
0.37%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 2.05%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
3.09%
Other current assets growth 50-75% of QCOM's 4.75%. Bruce Berkowitz notes fewer expansions. Possibly simpler working capital.
1.33%
Below half of QCOM's 7.43%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-2.46%
0.5-0.75x QCOM's -3.87%. Martin Whitman might see a risk of falling behind in asset investment or shifting strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.25%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.25%
Less than half of QCOM's -12.65%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.24%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 3.09%. Michael Burry suspects major tax losses or deferrals building up, raising concerns about sustained profitability.
-43.51%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -10.44%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
-1.77%
Below half of QCOM's -9.26%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.60%
Below half of QCOM's -1.52%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
8.29%
Less than half of QCOM's -19.95%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
10.32%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.19%
Below half of QCOM's 1.31%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
7.18%
Less than half of QCOM's -16.82%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
1.17%
Less than half of QCOM's -12.11%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-1.19%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.65%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
27.90%
Less than half of QCOM's -1.05%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
9.13%
Less than half of QCOM's -3.32%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.37%
Less than half of QCOM's -8.69%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.69%
Below half QCOM's -3.22%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-174.88%
Less than half of QCOM's 38.74%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.50%
Below half QCOM's 0.48%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-0.60%
Below half QCOM's -1.52%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
32.32%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 11.68%. David Dodd sees far stronger investment expansions than competitor.
0.24%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-61.96%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -1.04%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.